court-case-placeholder-896

ATF Engaged in the Business Rule

Texas v. ATF (2024)

This lawsuit is against the Biden-Administration's ATF rule known as “Definition of ‘Engaged in the Business’ as a Dealer in Firearms” which redefines what counts as a firearm dealer. This new definition not only up-ends a long-established understanding but further infringes on American's rights by criminalizing private transactions.

Share this case on:

Docket

District Court, N.D. Texas
2:24-cv-00089
Plaintiffs
Gun Owners Foundation
Gun Owners of America
Jeffrey W. Tormey
State of Louisiana
State of Mississippi
State of Texas
State of Utah
Tennessee Firearms Association
Virginia Citizens Defense League
Movant
Twenty-one Members of Congress
Defendants
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
Merrick Garland
Steven Dettelbach
United States Department of Justice
Summary

This lawsuit is against the Biden-Administration's ATF rule known as “Definition of ‘Engaged in the Business’ as a Dealer in Firearms” which redefines what counts as a firearm dealer. This new definition not only up-ends a long-established understanding but further infringes on American's rights by criminalizing private transactions. Aside from making previously legal transfers illegal, this effectively creates a universal background check system without Congressional approval. Thereby further expanding and updating the ATF's already massive gun registry, making it easier to enact and enforce a firearms confiscation program. GOA, GOF, state-based pro-gun groups, and several state Attorneys General teamed up to take the ATF to court over this rule change.